Please do include our story on your website. Male oriented, fear based obstetrics is one of the worst symptoms of the current medical paradigm's quest for dollars.
We had the most memorable experience of our lives because we took the time, especially Cece, to prepare for the magnificent birthing of our daughter. I am still absolutely astonished by it . . . a dream also, for me, come true.
---Ray
Today our daughter was born at home in a home waterbirth. What a
remarkable experience it was. Cece labored for about 10 hours. At 5 cm
(2 hours before the birth) she entered the water (98 degrees Farhenheit)
in a huge bathtub surrounded by glass on 3 sides. The water relaxed her
and reversed the feeling of coolness she had. Over the course of the
next few hours the baby crowned and emerged LAO position, swimming into
the water as it darted out after the shoulder was released.
A naturopathic physican, Jeanette Abel, N.D. and a nurse-midwife
attended the birth to support Cece and me. They just let her be. No
stress, no guilt trips, no worries. Cece made up the rules as to what
position she wanted to be in, only reminded occassionally to center
herself and not be lost in the pain. The intense desire to push the
baby out increased her heart rate to 168 but the baby was never in
distress. The atmosphere of home, the water and the energy of the
assistants helped. The pain became more tolerable. Yet the pain of
labor was present, no question about that!
The child was taken out of the water, placed on her mother's lap and the
cord was promptly clamped. The child was bluish but began pinking up by
3 minutes and had Apgar's of 9 and 10 at 1 and 5 minutes. The cranium
was molded from the process but minimally so.
Total labor time was about 10 hours, possibly 9, depending on when one
starts thinking about the beginning. The transition from the womb to
water resulted in the child feeling less distress and going through
stages of awareness over 20 minutes, which she concluded with solid eye
contact. There were a few superficial superior labial tears that were
sewn up by the naturopathic doctor and the bleeding was minimal. No
toxic antibiotics or drugs were given. The mother had a beautiful day
and recovery and the child, somewhat cranky and new to life, ended the
day sleeping soundly.
The birth experience was proceeded that night by a ritual of foot
washing of the parents, a group showering of plumeria flowers over the
parents, a sharing about parenting from some of the elder people
present, good wishes formed into a colored paper collage/ring that held
feathers and little plastic babies, a song, and the reading of poetry,
in addition to storytelling and a blessing of sage/incense by a renowned
Reiki Master.
The water symbolized the stability and absorptive quality of nature and
also its safety. I believe the physiological benefit of waterbirth is
real, yet it is an option only for those women who can separate
themselves from their preconceived fears. The medical profession puts
the fear of guilt and infanticide in the hearts of women who want to
experience a birthing process rather than a medicalized birthing
procedure. This must be reversed, as the harmful effects on the
children and mothers cannot even be fairly measured.
Birth is a joy! Ours was. In freedom, choice and alignment with
nature, there is joy. The gross misues of fear as a marketing tool by
the medical profession is well known by women. The unnecessary
suffering this avarice, driven consciously and unconsciously by greed
and ignorance, causes does little to expand the safety net for women or
bring them home to their heart center - estranging them from their true
nature.
Birth is a divine force that should be allowed to to manifest through
pregnant women. It is not something we should do TO them, as medical
professionals. The integration of mind, body, and spirit, achieved by
proper prenatal exercise, diet, supplements and psychological support
contributes to a birth that liberates and gives confidence to the
mother.
Responsible professional guidelines for women wanting waterbirths or
home births in the U.S. can be written and circulated. Europe has an
excellent track record of safety in doing home births. The cavalier
attitude of the medical profession in the U.S. does not properly define
the breadth of scientific, experience and knowledge about the essence of
the birth process.
One only needs to be part of one such experience to understand this at a
cellular level. I believe that 80-90% of women (albeit a guess on my
part) can deliver their child confidently and safely at home, or better
yet, in water with the support of a caring and professional midwife.
The cost of professionalizing the birth process and introducing
unacceptably high and unwarranted C-section rates is dramatic, running
in the billions of dollars yearly.
Professional relationships between an expectant mother and an
obstetrician require honest communication based upon ancient wisdom and
folklore as well as modern, scientific knowledge. The fear of a lawsuit
should not be used as an excuse to brandish flawed scientific
information about the risks of birthing. Lay women must emerge from the
shadows and uphold their right to experience the sacred transformation
that occurs in birth. They must not forget to trust themselves. May
they not forget to trust themselves and their knowing. They must not
yield to the voice of marginal, modern science when it speaks. May they
not do that. May they have the wisdom to seal and make visible their
connection with the creative force of nature and preserve it for the
generations who will follow us.
And may truth set us free.
-- Ray